FDEmax vs Traditional Consultancies
Skip the deck. Get the diff.
Accenture, Deloitte, and the big system integrators sell transformation programs measured in years and seven figures. FDEmax embeds engineers who ship production code in the first month.
Key Differentiators
Where the models actually diverge.
01
Code, not recommendations
Our deliverable is working software in your repos. If a recommendation matters, it arrives implemented, as a pull request you can review.
02
Weeks, not fiscal years
The FDE Pilot produces production changes and measured results in 30 days. Transformation programs measure in quarters before anything ships.
03
No seven-figure minimums
One system, one embedded FDE, one month. The entry point is sized so the evidence, not the sales cycle, drives expansion.
04
Seniors only
The person who scopes your engagement is the person accountable for delivery. Nobody learns on your codebase.
Honest Assessment
Which is right for you?
Choose Traditional Consultancies if
- You need organizational change management across thousands of people
- Procurement requires a global vendor with offices on every continent
- The problem is strategy and operating model, not software delivery
Choose FDEmax if
- The problem is code: legacy systems, security debt, slow delivery
- You want measurable results before committing serious budget
- You would rather review pull requests than steering-committee decks
Consultancies bill for the journey. FDEmax is accountable for the destination: merged, measured, running in production.